Check this out – this is a great idea. Let’s think of ways AHA could do something similar. Fit for Start! – a modification to current Start! online really…
http://www.plus3network.com... This new fitness-based social network allows exercise buffs to do good while getting in shape. After signing up, site members get to choose the cause they would like to support, upon which Plus 3 then pairs them with a corporate sponsor who makes donations according to the amount of activity miles completed.
Last weekend McNeil PPC, maker of Motrin, launched a new ad campaign online that was designed to be highly targeted. In this first installment, they targeted moms who "wear" their babies.
If it wasn't obvious to you why that video created a firestorm that led McNeil to replace their video with an apology from the VP in charge of Marketing Motrin, do not try to target new parents ever. That segment would be perfect for a viral push, in fact this went viral real fast, and it is still going, but not in the way McNeil or their agency want.
The next step McNeil's advertiser took was to create a persona to match the ad on Twitter. http://twitter.com/motrinmoms was supposed to be "just a mom who likes her motrin. lol" This voice was so disengenuous that it was already defending itself by the third post, telling a baby ewaring blogger to "take a chill pill" for posting her outrage.
Finally, McNeill took over 24 hours to respond here, even though they had someone on twitter and people monitoring blogs who should have been able to do that for them as the bruhaha was building. ComputerWorld has a good article about all this, including expert opinion.
While many now are arguing that the outrage was unfounded and the mom's were whiney and humorless, and others are blaming McNeill PPC for the way they responded. I would rather look at where they responded.
They crafted this campaign carefully considering several angles, the one they missed was their audience. They were obviously prepared for an audience having fun but when they got the opposite they shut it all down, took down the website for 12 hours and then brought it back up without the video and with a poorly crafted letter from the vp of marketing on the home page of motrin.com. They disappeared for 12 hours while the outrage and honestly, shadenfreude, worked its way through the social networks. Why didn't @motrinmoms stay? Why did she decide to stick with defensive, when she could have turned it around and made it fun. What if she had turned on her own ad, "yeah, see what happens when a bunch of ad men come up with a 'sympathetic' appeal to new moms" include fewer lolz and more rollzeyes or something? Why not dump the campaign with that voice instead of just dumping the campaign? It would be no less risky, but you would have kept the voice for Twitter and other future campaigns.
Youth Prefer to Receive Email Ads vs. thru Social Ntwkg.
Despite growing popularity of social networks such as MySpace and Facebook, young adults (age 18-34) are more likely to be influenced by email and direct-mail marketing than by ads or marketing messages on social networks… “It is too easy to assume that the media consumers who choose for their own news, information and entertainment are by default the best media to use for marketing messages,” said Mike Bloxham, CMD’s director of Insight and Research. “This is a dangerous assumption to make in a time when consumers are becoming increasingly aware of their level of control over their media experiences.”
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=f97f5323-11ed-45e4-ace8-9b47ff6ea544)
Posts
View Christian Caldwell's profile